RE: Scientific Evidence That God is Real
June 20, 2012 at 11:03 pm
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2012 at 11:06 pm by jackman.)
ok, the abhorrently incorrect use of buzzwords and scientific terminology does not constitute a scientific video. ie., that "tiny point" that started the universe, scientists refer to more properly as "singularity". also, refferring to the planet as "inhospitable" if any of the forces changed, i'd probably use "inhabitable", but hey that's just me. i don't even think your "started from nothing" is right (i could be wrong here). if i had time/desire to literally screen print each of those texts that popped up, i would have to start by correcting everything in it (granted by google fu'ing it to death) with real terminology and concepts or perhaps just reword it to actually sound more legit as to help in getting you a more learned person's rebuttal. (just as a note, buzzwords and starry backgrounds, do not a scientific video make). and i'm not a scientist, physicist, astrophysicist, cosmonaut, etc.. i simply read and deduce what i can from it.
so, in the beginning thru the middle of this video, all of those words and concepts that were used, the theories, protons, neutrons, dna etc... where in the bible do they mention those in the detail that they were spewed out here? if they're not in there, i'll assume that the person who made this video got them from science. the fact that they're explainable with mathematics, if you have the skill/knowlege/desire to do so, is reason enough for me to believe science. saying atheists can't prove something that's just a theory makes me want to take you to the penthouse and race you downstairs (me: elevator, you: window), nothin to worry about because gravity is *just a theory*. even the millions of facts that ARE proven en route to developing a theory are far more than you can provide to prove your god. i will stand completely corrected if you show me to be wrong.
now, saying that all of this stuff "must have been" and "how else could this have been", "couldn't have been anything but" and whatever other ways to explain their ignorance of facts that science does reveal - does not mean there must have been a designer. there is absolutely nothing in this video besides pomp and ignored research.
and it wasn't even entertaining ... it was painful.
so, in the beginning thru the middle of this video, all of those words and concepts that were used, the theories, protons, neutrons, dna etc... where in the bible do they mention those in the detail that they were spewed out here? if they're not in there, i'll assume that the person who made this video got them from science. the fact that they're explainable with mathematics, if you have the skill/knowlege/desire to do so, is reason enough for me to believe science. saying atheists can't prove something that's just a theory makes me want to take you to the penthouse and race you downstairs (me: elevator, you: window), nothin to worry about because gravity is *just a theory*. even the millions of facts that ARE proven en route to developing a theory are far more than you can provide to prove your god. i will stand completely corrected if you show me to be wrong.
now, saying that all of this stuff "must have been" and "how else could this have been", "couldn't have been anything but" and whatever other ways to explain their ignorance of facts that science does reveal - does not mean there must have been a designer. there is absolutely nothing in this video besides pomp and ignored research.
and it wasn't even entertaining ... it was painful.
they can land a rover on mars, yet they still have to stick a human finger up my ass to do a prostate exam?! - ricky gervais