RE: The debate is over
June 29, 2012 at 9:12 pm
(This post was last modified: June 29, 2012 at 9:12 pm by Simon Moon.)
(June 29, 2012 at 3:16 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Dawkins is a self proclaimed religious ignoramus.
Who cares? I'll bet he's a self proclaimed Lord of the Rings ignoramus too.
He sure does now a lot about the real, observable world though.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.