RE: The debate is over
June 29, 2012 at 9:24 pm
(This post was last modified: June 29, 2012 at 9:24 pm by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
(June 29, 2012 at 4:09 am)Tiberius Wrote: Fr0d0 is correct on this one. When it comes to religion, Dawkins is one of the most ignorant public figures around.
So fucking what? (at Frodo,not you Tib) the claim is a straw man,utterly irrelevant to me "as an atheist". I don't care about the sophistry and superstitions contained in EVERY formal religion,except academically.
So far not one religion has managed to prove ANY truth claim they make,starting with their notion of God. Until that time, religion can blow its collective mythology and superstition out of its collective arse.
In truth, I really don't care about what Richard Dawkins thinks about much of anything. I care even less what some dopey Christian apologist(s) think of him.
