RE: The debate is over
June 30, 2012 at 8:19 am
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2012 at 8:22 am by Light of Truth.)
Norfolk and Chance,
"We don't know that there is a god?" We also don't know that there isn't. Prove to me that there is not a god. And I will play your games.
You think I have an agenda? That is hilarious. I have been a part of this forum longer than you by about a year. I have been an atheist far longer than the amount of time I have been on this forum. I just try to keep people honest.
Skepsis,
Are you kidding me? I never said Mark was reliable. I qualified my statements with the word "if." Did you miss that? And you demonstrated that you have no idea about what Christianity is. Look up proto-orthodox Christologies. Jesus is considered fully god and fully man.
In regards to your second quote/commentary, are you being serious? I only brought in the word 'probable' when the FSM was brought up. Doing an analysis of my word use without contexts is irrelevant. Come on, man.
I did not contradict myself. I never said Mark was trustworthy. I qualified every one of my statements with the word "if." I also said "I am an atheist, but I have been operating under the assumption that Mark is reliable," which you quoted. Did you miss all of that or something?
"We don't know that there is a god?" We also don't know that there isn't. Prove to me that there is not a god. And I will play your games.
You think I have an agenda? That is hilarious. I have been a part of this forum longer than you by about a year. I have been an atheist far longer than the amount of time I have been on this forum. I just try to keep people honest.
Skepsis,
Are you kidding me? I never said Mark was reliable. I qualified my statements with the word "if." Did you miss that? And you demonstrated that you have no idea about what Christianity is. Look up proto-orthodox Christologies. Jesus is considered fully god and fully man.
In regards to your second quote/commentary, are you being serious? I only brought in the word 'probable' when the FSM was brought up. Doing an analysis of my word use without contexts is irrelevant. Come on, man.
I did not contradict myself. I never said Mark was trustworthy. I qualified every one of my statements with the word "if." I also said "I am an atheist, but I have been operating under the assumption that Mark is reliable," which you quoted. Did you miss all of that or something?
"God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us" (Romans 5:8).
"Always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you" (1 Peter 3:15).
"Always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you" (1 Peter 3:15).
