RE: The debate is over
June 30, 2012 at 9:20 am
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2012 at 9:22 am by Epimethean.)
Did you state that you were operating on the assumption that Mark is reliable?
Oh, yes. You did.
(June 30, 2012 at 8:44 am)Micah Wrote: Skepsis, tell me that you are kidding. You cannot be serious. I do not understand how you think that I believe that Mark is reliable. I said "If mark is reliable..." or "I have been operating under the assumption that Mark is reliable..." If I thought Mark was reliable, I would have said, "Mark is reliable," or "because Mark is reliable," but I did not say that because I do not believe that. And this is all apparent in what I wrote. Any argument I made was based on "ifs" because I was only trying to show possibilities. How can you not see this? I would suggest that you go back and re-read this thread.
Norfolk and Chance,
Just because you think that you don't have a need to prove that there are not any gods does not mean that there are not gods. That is all that I am trying to say.
Oh, yes. You did.
Trying to update my sig ...
