RE: The debate is over
June 30, 2012 at 9:42 am
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2012 at 9:45 am by Skepsis.)
(June 30, 2012 at 9:35 am)Micah Wrote: I am not lost in anything. You are looking for things that are not there.
At best, all you can say is that I said that people who think that Mark is reliable have evidence.
BUT I am not one of those who think Mark is reliable.
Usually when you think that others have evidence, you, too, accept the damn evidence. If I thought that those who believed aliens have landed on Earth have evidence, wouldn't it be fair to assume that I accept that evidence? Contextually, anyway. Especially if I said it just like that. Kind of like you did...
Usually I would overlook your mistake as a typo, but you came back defending your phrasing, fists flailing.
My conclusion is that there is no reason to believe any of the dogmas of traditional theology and, further, that there is no reason to wish that they were true.
Man, in so far as he is not subject to natural forces, is free to work out his own destiny. The responsibility is his, and so is the opportunity.
-Bertrand Russell
Man, in so far as he is not subject to natural forces, is free to work out his own destiny. The responsibility is his, and so is the opportunity.
-Bertrand Russell
