The debate is over

[Zen Badger]

So you have evidence for god then.....?

How is that in any way relevant to what he said?

Quite relevent actually old chap.

Frodo's claim is that Dawkins is ignorant of religion.

Exactly what aspect is Dawkins ignorant of?

Its specious claim to hold ultimate truth?

Its self assumed mantle of divine authority?

Its unsubstantiated ownership of objective morality?

Or its unverifiable claim for a unobservable deity?

Since Dawkin's main claim to fame(in this case anyway) is the falsehood of religion, all Frodo needs to do is produce evidence for god.

And then he will prove Dawkins wrong.

Until then...........

---

I am bewildered by some of the people on here. It is hopeless.

But it is entertaining.

---

You have presented not a shred of evidence to support your extraordinary claim that your fairy tale is true.

And of course you demand empirical evidence of a non empirical subject. Scientists find you embarrasasing.

Frods, as always, you come out with the classic lines

Which scientists would they be? Jason Lisle? Kent Hovind?