(July 4, 2012 at 3:17 am)fr0d0 Wrote:(July 3, 2012 at 5:23 pm)dean211284 Wrote: How can anyone say Dawkins is an ignoramus? The guy knows more about the subjects he speaks of than most fools who like to think they know more such as Craig or Lennox. Religion needs to provide evidence of its outlandish claims before it has a leg to stand on. But we all know it can't.
Dawkins is a good scientist. This is his specialism. He had some crazy opposition from the usual religious crazies and understandably retaliated. He writes clearly and well, and found himself suddenly a best selling author. Rich on the back of a popularist ignorant perspective. Anyone doing slightly more than scratching the surface sees this for what it is: unadulterated ignorance.
Yes, your sad attempt to dismiss him does indeed betray your unadulterated ignorance.
