(July 6, 2012 at 7:16 am)fr0d0 Wrote:Well how about you pick just one and we'll go from there.(July 6, 2012 at 5:29 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Please be more specific, what specific aspects are you referring to?Well Dawkins ignorance is a large topic. I have no desire to get bogged down once more in arguments that black is white. Can't I just say that ALL of his theological observations are based on ignorance? Pick one and I'll address it for you if you really want to. I've pointed out the fallacies in them all here before, as have many others. A quick google search will also pull up multitudes of theologians ridiculing his ignorance with reason.
Quote:Darfaq did I just read?(July 6, 2012 at 5:29 am)Zen Badger Wrote: He maintains religion is a lie, what opposition can be mustered against that.On what grounds? > on the grounds that there is no empirical proof of God. I rest my case. Twat.
Because there is no empirical proof of god, Dawkins is wrong.
I don't know what you're smoking Frods, but it's HEAVY SHIT.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.