RE: The debate is over
July 6, 2012 at 7:35 am
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2012 at 7:35 am by Ace Otana.)
(July 6, 2012 at 7:33 am)Zen Badger Wrote:(July 6, 2012 at 7:16 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Well Dawkins ignorance is a large topic. I have no desire to get bogged down once more in arguments that black is white. Can't I just say that ALL of his theological observations are based on ignorance? Pick one and I'll address it for you if you really want to. I've pointed out the fallacies in them all here before, as have many others. A quick google search will also pull up multitudes of theologians ridiculing his ignorance with reason.Well how about you pick just one and we'll go from there.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.