RE: Can Christianity explain how animals are so locationally diverse
July 10, 2012 at 6:10 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2012 at 6:11 pm by Erinome.)
(July 10, 2012 at 5:31 pm)Drich Wrote: What makes you think Australia was inhabbited during the flood?
What makes you think there was a flood? Oh, wait! The bible, right?
Just a little something to whoosh over your head, Drich-
http://australia.gov.au/about-australia/...ossil-past
Quote:The word that translates into 'earth' in the english mean the known world or whole inhabited earth. If Wicked man or 'Men of great renoun' (The actual target of the flood) had not made it to Australia then why should it be flooded?
Let me get this straight... you're arguing that Australia wasn't inhabited during the time of the alleged global flood, and you'r also arguing that Australia didn't flood because there were no wicked men there?
Ummm....
Quote:
Kinda like the 'ice bridge' that allowed man to walk from asia to North America and later become Inuit and Native americans??
"Ice bridge in my theory ok. Ice bridge in yours?? Don't be foolish."
You mean the land bridge?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beringia
What is this ice bridge foolishness you were talking about again?
42
