RE: Assault On Free Speech
August 1, 2012 at 7:57 pm
(This post was last modified: August 1, 2012 at 8:08 pm by Reforged.)
(August 1, 2012 at 7:28 pm)A Theist Wrote: Bullsh*t!Ok, gotta ask. Whats up with that?
Theres not a no swearing rule here.
(August 1, 2012 at 5:30 pm)A Theist Wrote:(August 1, 2012 at 3:52 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: That would be an adequate answer if I had asked as question relating to the mayor. I did not.I can oppose a lot of speech but that doesn't mean I have the right to stop it. It's not my call to tell a business owner what to do with his own business. But as a customer I have every right not to buy his goods if I don't find his political or religious speech acceptable.
Let me phrase it a different way. Do you consider it acceptable that anyone elected or unelected use their business as a platform for a political or religious agenda to be shoved down their customers throats as opposed to following the simple process of supply and demand which is what the customers pay for.
Is it not a severe violation of the obligation between supplier and consumer to provide an unbiased service to a market in demand of it?
Does this conduct not qualify as severely unethical?
Again, that was not an answer to the questions I was asking. If I was asking if you thought what the mayor did was right then it would be. If I asked if you have the right to order business owners around then alright. But those are not the questions I am asking.
"Is it not a severe violation of the obligation between supplier and consumer to provide an unbiased service to a market in demand of it?"
"Does this conduct not qualify as severely unethical?"
Its that simple, thats all I'm asking. Everything else in the paragraph I wrote is just an explanation of those questions.
If you don't want to answer those questions thats cool but at least tell me thats whats going on otherwise we're both wasting our time here.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.