The Doctrine of the Holy Trinity?

[Sam]

Jesus was 100% God and 100% man at the same time... is the full deal. Something (else) requiring Faith to believe in.

And with all the natural stuff, supposedly there was no proof of divine intervention to be had at the time (either). It's all consistent with a non provable God (if that was part of your question).

But by the definition you have shared with me these two things are mutually exclusive.

God is supernatural & Man is natural.

You cannot say that God assuming natural form does not break that definition, as you said to me in the Atheism thread;

If anything falls into the natural realm it becomes natural. God being supernatural breaks the theory again.

So god being natural would break his definition and ivalidate his existence.

As a point, I'm not using this argument to disprove God only to asses a weakness in the accepted hypothesis.

Sam