RE: Why was the crucifixion necessary ?
August 21, 2012 at 5:48 pm
(This post was last modified: August 21, 2012 at 5:50 pm by Drich.)
(August 21, 2012 at 3:49 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(August 21, 2012 at 3:36 pm)Drich Wrote: My evidence was tailored for me. I needed to see: X, Y and Z God showed me X, Y and Z. I am asking you what you believe X, Y, and Z is to you.
Sounds like you got conned.
You really don't get the whole intellectual honesty thing, do you?
Presenting someone with evidence tailored to support their bias is the antithesis of intellectual honesty.
...which is why people have been urging you from the day you arrived here, to present what you have. I note that you've refused to do so, which in my estimation places you on the spectrum somewhere between charlatan and troll, if unintentional.
Perhaps the problem is what you considered to be 'intelectually honest.' For it sounds like you are asserting that 'intelectual honesty' is nothing more than a group concensus. That no one is allowed to think outside of what 'the group' agrees upon. How honest is this? especially if 'the group' has it out for God? If 'the group' says their is no God then nothing that can be brought to the group would be considered now would it?
True intelectual honesty does not approach a situation with arguement to the contary, or any preconceived notions as to the reason a given experience will fail. Even so this is what you have done repeatly, with little to no consideration to anything outside of what you are willing to argue. then laughably you want to preach a sermon of intelectual honesty. (Me thinks the 'atheist' protest too much.) It sounds to me like you are projecting you personal failings onto me. Otherwise to be 'Intelectually Honest' one must research and test the waters for himself, not to think as 'the group' tells you to think.
(August 21, 2012 at 3:54 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Well, it appears that god's rules are shit Drich. It seems as though even you don't want to be a scape-goater. Thankfully, "god's rules" are as imaginary as "god".
(btw, do you honestly think that there are no people in the world that would still refuse to bend the knee to your cunt of a god -in truth simply a proxy- in a face to face meeting? Self preservation? From what? How? Aren't you always on about "a seperation from god"..wtf am I supposed to be preserving myself from all of a sudden, and how could I possibly preserve myself in the face of a god who willed my destruction? Is it time for thinly veiled references to hellfire and destruction already? You haven't thought this through.......)
Quote:We have all been given this life to make a choice if you choose your fellow man then who am i to say you made the wrong choice.
Who the fuck indeed? Just what have you been doing here these past few weeks then, eh?
care to answer the same question? Or is hyprocrisy not a character failing without "God's law" to point it out to you?
