(October 13, 2012 at 12:54 am)wkl6644 Wrote: JonbI think it might be so, but I recognise that I am also driven emotionally, and I also think I may have been developed to select information that aids my survival, as such it would be difficult to know which part of my thinking could be said to be purely or partly logical.
I don't. have issues if u want to say. 2+2 has more probability of being four based on witnessing goats. But are u sure being able to do logical thinking has nothing to do .with that answer
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 24, 2025, 10:16 pm
Thread Rating:
why there is a need to see in order to believe?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)