Man created in god's image

[Drich]

why make the point that humans are not clones or photocopies

To establish that we CAN retain attributes and features that are not considered to be attributes or features of God.

if you are in fact agreeing that god, at the time he created man in his image, had nipples and belly button?

My orginal arguement left the spectrum open to be interpereted from any number of possiable angles. We could have gone into the spiritual attributes or the similarities we share with God as orginally identified in genesis or we could have described what God incarnate (Jesus Christ) would indeed and did look like. IF you had not presumed too much.

Pointless first response.

Only if you presume too much.

So, now that we have cleared up that you think god did have nipples when he created humans, why did he have nipples????

Do you want me to list the logical fallacies you are commiting here, or will you conceed that you over stepped in your 'arguement?'

What possible use does god have for them??? and before women was even invented!

Anyone would think it's religious bollox written by half wits for the consumption of other half wits. The mind boggles.

Do you suffer from P.E. physically as well? or is it limited to verbal/written 'outbursts?'