What did you not understand about my first point (point "1")?
As for point "2", I'm saying that how do you know that your accepted knowledge of your experience is consistent with your idea of God? How does it validate it?
And what information do you consider trustworthy for belief in God?
As for point "2", I'm saying that how do you know that your accepted knowledge of your experience is consistent with your idea of God? How does it validate it?
And what information do you consider trustworthy for belief in God?
