RE: Which Comes First?
September 29, 2009 at 3:23 pm
(This post was last modified: September 29, 2009 at 3:26 pm by solarwave.)
To Eilonnwy:
I read your link; quite interesting.
I just said what I said because you claimed everything you believed was from science.
Its fair enough to what evidence, so what to you counts as evidence? An example?
Exactly so you believe because of reason not science?
I read your link; quite interesting.
I just said what I said because you claimed everything you believed was from science.
Its fair enough to what evidence, so what to you counts as evidence? An example?
(September 29, 2009 at 3:18 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: We believe the people we believe because of our experiences from the past. The veracity of their past claims allow us to model how true their current claims are likely to be. Ergo, we do not have "faith" in people we know; we are going off of past data to calculate the probability of their being right. We believe because of our knowledge not faith. This is much like your chair example in another thread.
Exactly so you believe because of reason not science?
Mark Taylor: "Religious conflict will be less a matter of struggles between belief and unbelief than of clashes between believers who make room for doubt and those who do not."
Einstein: “The most unintelligible thing about nature is that it is intelligible”
Einstein: “The most unintelligible thing about nature is that it is intelligible”
