Big Bang Theory

[Truth Matters]

The honest answer is nobody knows yet

Which is still a better answer than "jesus."

Why is embracing a Materialist belief (a belief that cannot possibly explain the absolute physical beginning) better than a fully sufficient and rationally plausible explanation?

---

The Big Bang is the absolute physical beginning from physical nothingness at the singularity boundary. Atheists do backflips to avoid the logical implications. They are in denial

Existence has always existed because non-existence can't exist.

Explain why God is required for the creation of the parts of the physical universe that has thus far been detected by science. Explain how atheists are in denial. Plus: see my sig.

Yes, non-existence cannot exist. Yet the physical Universe had an absolute physical beginning to it's existence. Therefore, something non-physical (Immaterial, Timeless, and spaceless existed) as the prime causal agency.

The entire physical Universe began. Science has fully established this. It's irrelevant that science is limited in it's ability to detect some regions. Atheists are in denial to deny the absolute physical beginning verified by Big Bang - or pretend it has no relevance in evidence.