RE: Big Bang Theory
November 8, 2012 at 9:34 pm
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2012 at 9:37 pm by Cyberman.)
(November 8, 2012 at 9:34 pm)Truth Matters Wrote: Why not? Because something cannot exist prior to it's own existence in order to cause itself into existence. This is patently obvious.
Now YOU EXPLAIN WHY SELF-CAUSATION IS POSSIBLE?
I never argued this. This is a point you raised. You explain why self-causation, if that's even the way it happened, is impossible.
(November 8, 2012 at 9:34 pm)Truth Matters Wrote: Timeless, spaceless and immaterial: Having no dimensionality of time, space or material. Pretending you can't understand is not an argument.
I quite agree. This is probably the only truthful thing you've said so far.
Do you have a problem with science when it leads to things like computers, the internet, cars, aeroplanes, space travel, GPS satellites, telecom satellites, medicines, surgical procedures, gene therapy, materials technology, farming technology, food preservation, etc etc, or is it just when science pokes its nose into territory that is the traditional purview of holy books?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'