@Truth Matters
I afraid, you are using parts to justify your stance and ignoring those parts that don't fit. This is essentially woolly thinking. It is that old adage of if I shoot an arrow in the air when I am on a chariot where does it fall, well its so obvious I don't have to test it. This is not a scientific approach. You are trying to combine two things which do not fit together, I don't even mind you trying to do it, but You cannot use it to make assertions if you have failed to show how it can be combined. And your posts so far have been nothing but assertions.
To make an assertion god made it, is fine, deluded, but fine, but to say god made it here you have to have evidence for, whether it be six thousand years ago or at the big bang, and there is no evidence for either of those propositions.
I afraid, you are using parts to justify your stance and ignoring those parts that don't fit. This is essentially woolly thinking. It is that old adage of if I shoot an arrow in the air when I am on a chariot where does it fall, well its so obvious I don't have to test it. This is not a scientific approach. You are trying to combine two things which do not fit together, I don't even mind you trying to do it, but You cannot use it to make assertions if you have failed to show how it can be combined. And your posts so far have been nothing but assertions.
To make an assertion god made it, is fine, deluded, but fine, but to say god made it here you have to have evidence for, whether it be six thousand years ago or at the big bang, and there is no evidence for either of those propositions.