RE: Big Bang Theory
November 9, 2012 at 1:12 pm
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2012 at 1:14 pm by Truth Matters.)
(November 9, 2012 at 12:57 pm)jonb Wrote: @Truth Matters
I afraid, you are using parts to justify your stance and ignoring those parts that don't fit. This is essentially woolly thinking. It is that old adage of if I shoot an arrow in the air when I am on a chariot where does it fall, well its so obvious I don't have to test it. This is not a scientific approach. You are trying to combine two things which do not fit together, I don't even mind you trying to do it, but You cannot use it to make assertions if you have failed to show how it can be combined. And your posts so far have been nothing but assertions.
To make an assertion god made it, is fine, deluded, but fine, but to say god made it here you have to have evidence for, whether it be six thousand years ago or at the big bang, and there is no evidence for either of those propositions.
You have demonstrated nothing about my argument that is inconsistent or woolly. You merely claim it with empty assertions.
I have presented just one of the many potent evidences for God (touching on two with Fine Tuning). You IGNORE the evidence, but have not defeated anything in the slightest - nor have you demonstrated any plausible alternatives to the evidence. Now you claim that no evidence exists?
Sorry, but your faith that Materialism can account for the absolute beginning of Physics is sub-rational. I have a fully rational, sufficient and coherent causal agency. You have nothing but hollow protests that have no merit.
The irony is that you call me 'deluded' as a pejorative, yet your Atheism reduces mind to nothing but chemically induced delusion. You have no other logical possibilities available to explain mind.
Logic matters