(November 7, 2012 at 9:49 pm)Truth Matters Wrote: The Big Bang is the absolute physical beginning from physical nothingness at the singularity boundary.
All I am asking for is for you to get your puppies out.
Absolute physical beginning
The above statement is not proven, Absolute physical beginning
It can only be an absolute physical beginning if the physical started then, so for the statement to stand, a before where there is no physicality has to be established.
Now on one had I am looking at Sir Roger Penrose amoung others;
Quote:Sir Roger Penrose OM, FRS (born 8 August 1931), is an English mathematical physicist, recreational mathematician, philosopher and Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the Mathematical Institute of the University of Oxford, as well as Emeritus Fellow of Wadham College.
He is internationally renowned for his scientific work in mathematical physics, in particular his contributions to general relativity and cosmology. He has received a number of prizes and awards, including the 1988 Wolf Prize for physics which he shared with Stephen Hawking for their contribution to our understanding of the universe.[1]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose
On on the other we have a bloke on the web who says his dad was a nuclear physicist.
So all I am asking is your evidence not just an assertion that's the way it is.
physical nothingness at the singularity boundary.
Similarly for this part of the statement to stand there must be nothing at the singularity, but the singularity contains everything of this universe, so by definition it is not nothing. So I don't think I am being out of order in requesting some sort of evidence to back up your statement other than just an assertion; that is how it is.