Big Bang Theory

[Zen Badger]

Suppose for the sake of argument that we accept that the universe had an intelligent first cause( which I'm not BTW, you have yet to provide any actual evidence that this is the case).

Now prove that it is in fact your god that is responsible.

Why? I don't need to. We are discussing an ontological question.
I don't need to get distracted defending a narrow epistemological position that has no relevance to the ontological question.

I'de be happy to take up your questions separately, but not as a red-herring distraction away from the Ontology in question.

You are arguing for the existence of god, by extension... your particular brand of god.
It is not a distraction, it is relevant.