Quote:Yes, the physical science cannot speak to the conditions causally antecedent to the beginning of physics. It's beyond the scope of science.
Cosmology is science, and part of cosmology deals with the origins of the uinverse and what was before it.
Quote:They understand well the Theistic implications of Big Bang and Fine Tuning confirmations.
Fine Tuning is a logical fallacy. It assumes that world was created for carbon-based life, when it's carbon-based life that adapts to the world.
Quote: I am absolutely certain Hawking, Lawrence Krauss and Michio Kaku prostitute their professional integrity to the services of Atheism.
I'd love to see your scientific credentials.
Quote:Michio Kaku was on CNN claiming that Higgs Boson particles have some implications for cosmological origins, 'disproving God' was just naked lying of the highest order. He knows what he said is false.
You seem to know what Michio Kaku thinks better than him. Do you have any supernatural powers?
Quote:Yet, any novice physicist knows vacuum energy is not Nothing.
That's because "nothingess" doesn't exist. The universe could have started via quantum vacuum. Krauss was using a metaphore to explain his theory in layman's terms.
Quote:Hawking peddles a 'no boundaries' proposal hoping to give an illusion of an infinite Universe - absolutely irrelevant to the fact that our Universe has a proven finite past.
Our universe may not be all that exists.
Quote:My Christian epistemology of God is PERFECTLY CONSISTENT with the scientific evidence. Can you provide any basis to claim otherwise?
Your Christian epistemolgy claims that a dead body came back to life. This isn't consistent with scientific evidence.
Moreover, the unpredictable nature of quantum mechanics disproves the idea of a "design" behind the universe. It's impossible to implement a design in an universe that obeys to quantum mechanics.
