Quote:Either lots of scientific disciplines are actually not science at all, or that list is a badly flawed explanation of what constitutes as science. If we agree that the latter is the case, then solarwave needs a better answer.
Good point, and I can't agree with either statement fully because it is a grey area. I don't know if you have heard of the concepts of "hard" and "soft' sciences but here is the wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_and_soft_science
I would lean towards a more inclusive definition because I value the study of economics, politics, psychology, and scociology which would be considered "soft." Even theology could be included in the list although it is really just a cross between sociology, politics, and psychology (From my worldview there is nothing to study). As you well know, I believe there is probably not a god but studying the phenomenon of the perception of god IS very interesting and necessary. "Why all this talk of god?" is a question that I think should NOT be brushed away. After all, the concept needs to be dealt with in manner that includes people in society while comprehending their needs.
Thanks for the compliments; I have my moments of lucidity
Rhizo
