a question pih5100.
Why this dishonest start? Why invent a uni - required questionaire to start a debate about faith? Why go through all that trouble?
Eaven if you would have been sincere, you have lost every single other person who could answere your questions by starting a debate on tha basis of someones answeres.
Why not make start your debate about the origin of moral values in a seperate thread in which you clearly underline that you want to debate this subject.
Using the a "questioner" as a pretext to start a debate doesnt make you shine in the brightest and most honest light, you know?
Why this dishonest start? Why invent a uni - required questionaire to start a debate about faith? Why go through all that trouble?
Eaven if you would have been sincere, you have lost every single other person who could answere your questions by starting a debate on tha basis of someones answeres.
Why not make start your debate about the origin of moral values in a seperate thread in which you clearly underline that you want to debate this subject.
Using the a "questioner" as a pretext to start a debate doesnt make you shine in the brightest and most honest light, you know?
