But you know very well chatty that theology is nothing at all to do with science. This is your own particular cross you choose to bear that somehow this has to be verifiable when it's a logical impossibility. Look at what you've written - you talk directly to your old self.
Unfortunately for you the idea of Christianity is completely logically consistent. The idea of God is currently fixed because we've reached a point that hasn't been improved upon for 2009 years. If an impovement were made we would change.
Where there is room for speculation again you dismiss it out of hand like somehow intellectual speculation and the struggle to understand is a bad thing.
I fully support science and am in awe at scientific knowledge and discovery. Unlike you I don't have to let that impose a lack of faith as well, because I understand faith to be a different subject. God can be proven through logic, just not through scientific method.
Unfortunately for you the idea of Christianity is completely logically consistent. The idea of God is currently fixed because we've reached a point that hasn't been improved upon for 2009 years. If an impovement were made we would change.
Where there is room for speculation again you dismiss it out of hand like somehow intellectual speculation and the struggle to understand is a bad thing.
I fully support science and am in awe at scientific knowledge and discovery. Unlike you I don't have to let that impose a lack of faith as well, because I understand faith to be a different subject. God can be proven through logic, just not through scientific method.
