Eilonnwy, Arcanus has a point. Carl Sagan's point was about probability, and how the negative claim cannot be proven no matter how ridiculous the claim may be.
That is exactly the problem with these god claims.
This god is supposedly outside of our time and space.
There is no method known to test the existence of this god.
All previous tests and their results are being reasoned away with pretty much the same arguments as the dragon analogy.
So what is the difference between an untestable and non-temporal god and a non-existent god?
That is exactly the problem with these god claims.
This god is supposedly outside of our time and space.
There is no method known to test the existence of this god.
All previous tests and their results are being reasoned away with pretty much the same arguments as the dragon analogy.
So what is the difference between an untestable and non-temporal god and a non-existent god?
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
