(November 9, 2008 at 1:41 pm)Tiberius Wrote: So he reckons your "brief history" wasn't accurate. What exactly are you finding so funny about that? Why not instead of swearing at him and being rude, you back up your assertions with evidence?
If you are going to keep criticizing my posts why do you not read them or at least consider them more carefully?
My complaint - the reason I didn't take it seriously - is that josef questioned the Christian History, which had very little to do with anything in the first place, WITHOUT providing a reason for doing so or an alternative position.
How, or more importantly, why, would I respond to a baseless criticism? What would I say - "Uh, no. That's not true."
