RE: Very first Religion?
November 9, 2008 at 10:18 pm
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2008 at 10:26 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(November 2, 2008 at 5:16 pm)Daystar Wrote: I wonder - have any of you ever actually studied the history of science or do you just have some utopian idea that it is everything ever good and all knowing sort of spoonfed bullshit you think as a quasi messiah?I haven't studied science and history. And I've just read TGD. I'm new to science and also new to more fully understanding religion. And yet this doesn't mean that the supernatural exists because you've apparently studied more. Certainly not. Maybe you know more overall, but I actually understand the question of God's existence. I actually understand it as a question rather than an answer. He is no answer because he just postulates what needs to be explained. I understand that God is very improbable. There are many brilliant scientists who understand this also and understand it in much greater detail than me to say the least.
You all are pretty young, aren't you - not yet graduated to the more mature typical political science minded atheist ... hating some one elses 'fairy' tales and that sort of thing?
Just curious.
Whatever I know about science, history and religion, I don't need to disprove the supernatural. I at least understand that and also that the bible is not proof of the supernatural. And why it isn't proof of the supernatural
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." - Christopher Hitchens
Oh and by the way; one thing I really do understand is that science has discovered and demonstrated truths about the universe and has proper evidence to back them up. Religion on the other hand almost certainly has not and can not.