(January 7, 2013 at 7:57 pm)Mark 13:13 Wrote:(January 7, 2013 at 7:45 pm)pocaracas Wrote: I must have missed that part... what did you want to be proved?
The proof of god we require is simple. If such an entity exists and interacts with this planet, we require some measure of such interaction which would be at odds with all known physics.... I don't know if that would be enough, but it would be a start... warm fuzzy feelings and other mental representations are invalid as proof... See? simple!
see post number 49
Thanks. Let's look into it then!
(January 7, 2013 at 5:47 pm)Mark 13:13 Wrote: No one has proved that the burden of proof is with the claiment all they have done is make claims it should be based on custom and practice, or on fanciful ideas on how the universe of logical discussion would break down without proving or testing these ideas. You claim the burden of proof belongs to the person making the claim so now follow your own maxim the one you love so much and PROVE YOUR CLAIM. let me see proof and not conjecture, assumptions and bias.
If you require proof of such a claim, it is because you can see some merit in the negation of said claim.
Like I implied in the post with all the axion bottles (and has been presented to you many times), such negation leads only to a ridicule, absurd and non-sensical position.
