What one thing would disprove Christianity to you?

[fr0d0]

Please sir, explain why we should accept that angels et al (the 'x') be defined as non-empirical (the 'y').

You mean how do I understand that to be a reality, where you do not. Why is my world view not limited to the empirically provable. The detail that Ryft was expanding on that you say you find so unsatisfactory?

---

So what was the evidence if any that convinced you angels et all exist? If you don't need evidence, what was the thought process?

What kind of evidence are you talking about?