Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
cannibalism and you (christianity)
August 27, 2015 at 1:28 pm
Cannibalism is fine in the confines of eating the bread and drinking the blood of your savior.
..........WHY ON EARTH DO YOU THINK EATING THE FLESH.. *ahem* flesh and drinking the blood of your savior is a good idea.
I mean we can know cannibalism is wrong even metaphorical cannibalism should be frowned upon as well.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 30979
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: cannibalism and you (christianity)
August 27, 2015 at 1:33 pm
Is it really metaphorical for those who believe in transubstantiation? I think not.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: cannibalism and you (christianity)
August 27, 2015 at 1:39 pm
It's absolutely disgusting to pretend to eat human flesh. Either do it properly or not at all.
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: cannibalism and you (christianity)
August 27, 2015 at 1:45 pm
I don't know if this is applicable to Christers, but I find a satisfaction I get from nothing else in knowing elements I have assimilated from Doyle are as yet still percolating in me, even though diluted by time they may be now, all these years later.
It's a comfort to experience to this day a sharing of ourselves from so long ago.
The big problem with the Christer version of it is how transubstantiation is 100% more unreal compared to Doyle's semen.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 951
Threads: 19
Joined: April 26, 2015
Reputation:
26
RE: cannibalism and you (christianity)
August 27, 2015 at 1:52 pm
I haven't had human flesh before, but I don't think that it tastes like bread and wine.
Transubstantiation = Fail!
![[Image: 7836d322f944c7a21818272cc22170569cc0ec8f...c347ee.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.quickmeme.com%2Fimg%2F78%2F7836d322f944c7a21818272cc22170569cc0ec8ffe43bf8f75373997a9c347ee.jpg)
NVM, some evidence for transubstantiation.
Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.' -Isaac Asimov-
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: cannibalism and you (christianity)
August 27, 2015 at 1:56 pm
(This post was last modified: August 27, 2015 at 1:59 pm by Alex K.)
I'm hungry now.
Anyways, I've somewhere read this explanation, maybe even here: in Aristotelian philosophy, objects have their accidental properties, but also essential ones. So a chair (it's always a chair) has accidental properties such as color, material and so on - but it also has an essential chairness property which makes it a chair and which does not change if you change one of its other aspects. Now, transsubstantiation does obviously not change the accidental properties of the cracker such that it would look like a holy t-bone steak, nor with the wine. But it changes the essential nature of the cracker and the wine while leaving its unimportant accidental features unchanged. So: it has really become a piece of J-meat, but it doesn't look it to the naive observer who only sees the accidental features with their senses. The essential features can be glimpsed by faithy faith alone I suppose.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
