What one thing would disprove Christianity to you?

[Tea Earl Grey Hot]

Please sir, explain why we should accept that angels et al (the 'x') be defined as non-empirical (the 'y').

You mean how do I understand that to be a reality, where you do not. Why is my world view not limited to the empirically provable. The detail that Ryft was expanding on that you say you find so unsatisfactory?

What? No. That's not at all what I asked. Angels = non-empirical. Interstellar spaceship = empirical. Why? It's a pretty simple question.

So what was the evidence if any that convinced you angels et all exist? If you don't need evidence, what was the thought process?

What kind of evidence are you talking about?

I'll take anything if you have it. What conviced you angels et al exist? Do you even have a reason?

---

Then stop committing the fallacy!

I never ever committed it. You misconstrued it. I don't doubt that you'll continue to accuse people of it without reason.

What then was all your talk about what is commonly accepted? Why did you reference a dictionary? What did I miss?