(January 18, 2013 at 3:36 am)catfish Wrote: LOL again! Holy fuck man, what kind of stupid cunt are you exactly?
If eonian is derived from eon, then the definition of eon is key to determining what eonian means...
Except, crucially, the word has a dual meaning, as some words do. You are claiming that definition A is the one used in the bible. Surtr is claiming definition B is, and more importantly, he provided a logical reason for his thinking. This one:
Quote:Let me clear something up for you: There is no indication in the bible of where those souls would go if Hell was temporary, and when they are brought back in Revelations, they are cast back into the "lake of fire" after being judged again.
So now, instead of simply insisting that there is no other definition- a position that is roundly refuted by the fact that most dictionaries produce two results- you have to either provide a reason why your definition is more likely, or to admit that you have none, and as a consequence take the hit to your position's credibility.
Have I laid this out clearly enough for you?
Sorry to butt into someone else's argument, but fucking hell, some people just do not know how to debate correctly...
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!