(January 19, 2013 at 8:34 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(January 19, 2013 at 8:17 pm)ThatMuslimGuy Wrote: I would never say there not true Muslims. I would say they are not following the Qur'an and the Sunnah. If they have taken the Shahadah they are still Muslim.
No, the violent ones are the ones who are reading it correctly, in all three Abrahamic religions.
The God character(like reviewing a character in a book) has club members, the narrative as written describes the "chosen people"' as their job is to defend the leader.
You simply think non-violence is the way to defend it, otherwise you wouldn't be defending it at all by trying to appeal to us that you are right. They the violent ones in all three of these religions also read the same books and come to different conclusions, thus proving my point that those books are inherently divisive.
You cannot use the cop out excuse "I got it right, and they got it wrong" because all of you think you got it right and read the same books".
With all the division in the world due to all these religions I'd say all books have an inept God who cant write, or have written a clear instruction manual that would prevent all this murder on anyone's part.
If Allah/God?Yahweh were to own a bicycle factory and made such sloppy assembly instructions the bike buyers would end up with squid for spokes and murder their neighbor for their bike chain.
But the world in such a peaceful state isn't it?
I'm not using any cop out. If you read something e.g.
"None of you truly believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself."
[Reported by al-Bukhari (13), Muslim (45), Ahmad (3/176), at-Tirmidhi (5215), Ibn Majah (66), an-Nasa'i (8/115), and Ibn Hibban (234)]
how have i read it wrong?
Yes anyone can pick a handful of verses and justify something. But is that what the religion teaches? No. You don't take a handful of verses, you take the whole.
