worst religious debater EVAR

[killybob]

I saw Hamza debating Dan Barker last year and I found him quite persuasive. His arguments were nothing special, but he delivered his arguments and responded to Barker in a way that was appealing and compelling.

You shouldn't be persuaded by the character of the individual. His arguments should be what persuades you, not his presentation. Hitler was a charismatic and passionate man with a sense of humour, but do you find his arguments compelling?
If Hamza's logic and reasoning has no merit, you shouldn't be falling for his charm. We have a word for that: asininity.