RJH, you have a valid point. It's still working from the opposite direction though.
Let's say I ate a bowl of square-circles while riding my unicorn on the way to work in the center of the Sun. Let's say that is the absolute truth.
While it's true that anyone's presuppositions would get in the way of arriving at this truth about my trip to work this morning, we know, by other logic, that this is very unlikely.
We know that someone going from a reading level of 8 to acing a high-level English exam is unlikely. We know that 2nd hand hearsay is dubious. We know that God responding to miracles is unprovable.
How on earth are we expected to arrive at the conclusion that the Christian God responded, specifically, to the subject's prayers? What kind of logic would lead us there?
What kind of logic would lead you to the truth about my morning?
Let's say I ate a bowl of square-circles while riding my unicorn on the way to work in the center of the Sun. Let's say that is the absolute truth.
While it's true that anyone's presuppositions would get in the way of arriving at this truth about my trip to work this morning, we know, by other logic, that this is very unlikely.
We know that someone going from a reading level of 8 to acing a high-level English exam is unlikely. We know that 2nd hand hearsay is dubious. We know that God responding to miracles is unprovable.
How on earth are we expected to arrive at the conclusion that the Christian God responded, specifically, to the subject's prayers? What kind of logic would lead us there?
What kind of logic would lead you to the truth about my morning?
- Meatball
