RE: The major proof of the inexisrence of God
November 13, 2008 at 3:53 pm
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2008 at 4:15 pm by josef rosenkranz.)
(November 12, 2008 at 7:51 pm)Jason Jarred Wrote: Is there going to be a test? Should I be taking Notes?
:p
Suit your self, it's a free country.
Is that all to it? No comments ? No f-words ? The "Big brother" did not permit to discuss the issue ? what ?
quote
[
Because, for as I have explained above, atm as far as we know, thats the way it is, scientifically. How could we 100% disprove God? We can't (atm at least, and I'm not sure if we ever will be able to, who knows?). Its Russell's Teapot! It would actually be unscientific to claim that we can or have 100% absolutely disproved God when as far as we know so far, according to evidence and probability, we can't and haven't. So its not a retreat if its the scientific truth!
[/quote]
OK. So we agree that science don't have the possibility to totally disprove God.
You are proving this in your way ,I in my way ,but in essence we both agree about the same impotence.
The problem is that you stop here , I would say in a fatalistic resignation ,in alignment with RD and his "almost certainty thar God does not exist",whereas I suggest another way ,you are free to consider it right or wrong , but it is at least worth to discuss that way .
