(November 4, 2009 at 3:16 pm)Saerules Wrote: Considering all those differing definitions Adrian just listed for what a 'universe' is... surely you don't believe what you just said? For now, define how it is 'obvious' that someone is a fucking lunatic?This thread supports exactly what I said. Forum members were discussing what is and isn't within the reach of science, and Leo proposed that anything in our Universe is, based on his definition. Other forum members came forward with differing definitions and it seems we're in the process of clarifying what is meant by 'Universe' in regards to the discussion. Nobody is wandering in here with a definition of Universe that means 'elbow pad'. That kind of fringe lunacy is what I would call an incorrect definition. Differing ideas of what a "Universe" is aren't.Here again is a differing definition... to you it is obvious... to me it is quite the opposite. And how are you defining 'lunatic', for you seem to be implying that I am one?
We have to agree upon these definitions before we can discuss your statements
(edit note: my post number, 1300... is obviously unlucky!)
I honestly think we're both on the same side of this argument, I just don't like the way you originally phrased it. Hypothetical, impractical, transcendental-idealistic garbage.
- Meatball