Well, banking systems have been overthrown or fundamentally altered before now, but I think that you're expecting rather much of Dawkins to be able as one man to alter all of human civilisation. The Vatican isn't, and I would argue has not been a necessary organisation for centuries. Religion has been an integral part of humanity for too long for you to expect that Dawkins can somehow come up with some rhetoric that can convince everyone, especially when there are an overwhelming number of religious people who simply will not listen to reason. Point out their flaws, they'll make excuses. Indicate the truth, they'll cover it with scripture. Ask them for evidence, they'll ask you to have faith. I've met these people, and they will go to any length to shut their eyes, and will ash out when you try to open them.
As far as I can tell, Dawkins cannot do anything more than he is doing, short of actually creating an armed movement.
As far as I can tell, Dawkins cannot do anything more than he is doing, short of actually creating an armed movement.
If you believe it, question it. If you question it, get an answer. If you have an answer, does that answer satisfy reality? Does it satisfy you? Probably not. For no one else will agree with you, not really.
