The Case for Theism

[Darkstar]

If the universe didn't exist and life didn't exist its still possible a Creator who hasn't created anything might exist, but there would be no evidence to suspect there was a Creator. Under such a circumstance the atheists claim there is no evidence of a Creator would be true. The claim there is no evidence of a Creator is false.

Um, no, it's still true. There isn't any evidence for a creator, this is just one big argument from ignorance.

However, evidence doesn't become non-evidence just because you don't agree with the conclusion.

You're right, it doesn't. Too bad your conclusion isn't supported by anything. The only "evidence" of your hypothesis is the lack of irrefutable proof against it, which is not evidence at all, especially against something unfalsifiable.

I know exactly why most atheists maintain vehemently the position there is no evidence in favor of theism. Most atheists will always deny there is evidence in favor of theism because they like to marginalize theism as strictly a faith proposition.

But it is just a faith proposition. Watch this. How about you subsititute "god" in your argument with "Flying Spaghetti Monster" or "Magic Pink Unicorn". You won't have any less evidence for them either.

If they were to admit there is evidence that favors the theist narrative then its no longer just a faith proposition that can be easily dismissed.

But we'd be lying...and even if we were telling the truth, that would only support an agnostic deist position at best.