The Case for Theism

[Esquilax]

Okay.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent

http://biologos.org/questions/genetic-evidence

http://www.astro.umd.edu/~miller/teachin...ides08.pdf

Enjoy!

Ok so you personally experienced this evidence with one or more of your five senses? And no a computer screen doesnt count

So you experienced god creating the universe with one or more of your five senses? And no, the bible doesn't count.

So, you experienced the correctness of Borel's law with one or more of your five senses? And no, a computer screen doesn't count.

Do you see the flaws in your "logic" there? If we're just accepting sense experiences as evidence then you can't even verify the inside of your neighbor's house, unless you've been there. You can hardly verify your creation account.

The other important factor is that, if I wanted to, I could experience some of that evidence: I could even replicate the microbe and fruit fly experiments and watch the species evolve, if I want. Because scientific results are testable and replicable, but god is not.

So, if you really want to continue this line of reasoning then fine, but that does mean you'll have to admit you can't prove anything at all except your little sphere of experience either. And that means no god, and no evidence against evolution either unless you were there to see it.

So... really?