The Case for Theism

[Drew_2013]

Genkaus

So far, I've refuted two lines of evidence and I'd refute the third one, but really, there isn't any new argument here. If you are going to use the same old combination of false dichotomy and argument from incredulity, then you might as well consider all your future arguments refuted.

I understand and appreciate that your a legend in your own mind. I understand that just because you think you have refuted an argument or line of evidence that it therefore stands refuted. It's not refuted just because you say so or because you think your logic and reasoning is so superior to anyone else. Isn't it self serving and silly for you to give an opininion about the veracity of your own counter arguments? Its up to other impartial people who are neither commited theists or committed atheists to judge the merits of our respective arguments. You are not just an advocate of atheism you are an apologist for it. You can't be opposing counsel in this case, as well as judge and jury.

Just curious...is it a irrefutable fact in your mind that no God exists or are you willing to say its an opinion of yours?

Oh and by the way I have refuted all your counter arguments they are null and void as well as any future arguments you might make. Thanks for participating but you lose.