The Case for Theism

[genkaus]

I understand and appreciate that your a legend in your own mind.

Nope. Just a regular smart guy.

I understand that just because you think you have refuted an argument or line of evidence that it therefore stands refuted.

There being no evidence to the contrary supports this line of thinking.

It's not refuted just because you say so or because you think your logic and reasoning is so superior to anyone else.

Nope. Just you.

Isn't it self serving and silly for you to give an opininion about the veracity of your own counter arguments?

Nope.

Its up to other impartial people who are neither commited theists or committed atheists to judge the merits of our respective arguments.

There have been two such judgments. Both Apo and Mystic - neither of whom is a committed atheist - have judged your arguments to be irrational.

You are not just an advocate of atheism you are an apologist for it.

Nope. There is no doctrine within atheism for me to apologize for.

You can't be opposing counsel in this case, as well as judge and jury.

Why would that stop me from reminding the 'jury' that your arguments are wrong and have been refuted?

Just curious...is it a irrefutable fact in your mind that no God exists or are you willing to say its an opinion of yours?

Neither. Its a justified belief.

Oh and by the way I have refuted all your counter arguments they are null and void as well as any future arguments you might make. Thanks for participating but you lose.

Show me where and you might just have half a point.