Quote:Listen, dude: if you want to demand by fiat that we don't use certain arguments then it's up to you to know what those arguments are before you do. I've given you proof to support a theory I introduced into evidence, read it or not at your leisure; the point is that I could do it. The multiverse hypothesis isn't some cockamamie bullshit I'm using as chaff to distract against your theory, it's a real scientific one that goes against the dichotomy you're trying to set up.
And I am making my own case in that regard. Why should I have to read some links and guess what they mean to you or what you believe is salient? Do you own work.
Quote:If it was self evident you wouldn't have literally everyone here arguing against you.
As a theist I could say the sky was blue and folks would argue it.
Quote:I noticed it. I also noticed you're trying to misapply those words. Do you even know what the argument from personal incredulity is?
I'm sure according to the atheist dictionary and othordoxy it means something else.
Quote:you're being skeptical of the path that the evidence leads, because you just can't imagine how that would be so.
I see...so your belief in atheism is imaginary...I buy that.
Quote:That, or you're being dishonest to try and score points.
If you want to call me dishonest or a liar get in back of the line.
Quote:You fucking liar.
Get in back of the line.
