No, that is what atheists typically think. People who see visions and hear things from God are considered to be in touch with the supernatural if they do not have some sort of mental defect that proves they are crazy, in virtually every other culture.
You are using mental health terminology to advance your movement. You don't have one bit of evidence that I am suffering at all, but that won't stop you, because you don't care about evidence, you care about advancing atheism.
It would be one thing to say "I do not believe that you have experienced these things and perhaps you have some mental issue". That is not the response I have received, which, in absence of any evidence, was to accuse me of having mental issues and attempt to defame my character through calling me crazy.
This is all done without evidence. Atheists have high standards that they require people have for making claims that involve religion, but when they involve atheism, every sort of propositional claim about anything can all fall under the non-rational atheist rejection of a religious claim, even though that claim depends on every single objection being true.
You won't produce a shred of evidence that links anything I have posted to a mental illness because you don't have any. You have suspicion and that is enough for you to pronounce me crazy in the kangaroo court of atheist "critical thinking".
You are using mental health terminology to advance your movement. You don't have one bit of evidence that I am suffering at all, but that won't stop you, because you don't care about evidence, you care about advancing atheism.
It would be one thing to say "I do not believe that you have experienced these things and perhaps you have some mental issue". That is not the response I have received, which, in absence of any evidence, was to accuse me of having mental issues and attempt to defame my character through calling me crazy.
This is all done without evidence. Atheists have high standards that they require people have for making claims that involve religion, but when they involve atheism, every sort of propositional claim about anything can all fall under the non-rational atheist rejection of a religious claim, even though that claim depends on every single objection being true.
You won't produce a shred of evidence that links anything I have posted to a mental illness because you don't have any. You have suspicion and that is enough for you to pronounce me crazy in the kangaroo court of atheist "critical thinking".
