@Missluckie26
While many people don't do well facing adversity, many people do well. The greater the chance of failure, the greater the praise in success. What is important is to note the opportunity we been given to earn praiseworthiness. I feel personally honored by what life gives the opportunity of achieving.
Sure you can focus on people not doing well in facing adversity, but, perhaps the gems that do well, are worth the tribulations and suffering.
As far as peace goes in the long run, and happiness, I don't subscribe to religion, and the argument doesn't need a religion to be true, it's simply saying a benevolent Creator is possible in the world with evil and suffering and that in the long run, it's possible all humans (those who fail and those who are successful) will be at peace.
From that perspective, being given the opportunity to earn praise, would seem benevolent, specially down the line, billions years of peace and tranquility will make suffering in this world seem trivial.
The negation of premise would be that earned higher praise facing evil and suffering cannot be out a worthy goal of creating a world that encompasses evil and suffering. But this seems false to me.
While many people don't do well facing adversity, many people do well. The greater the chance of failure, the greater the praise in success. What is important is to note the opportunity we been given to earn praiseworthiness. I feel personally honored by what life gives the opportunity of achieving.
Sure you can focus on people not doing well in facing adversity, but, perhaps the gems that do well, are worth the tribulations and suffering.
As far as peace goes in the long run, and happiness, I don't subscribe to religion, and the argument doesn't need a religion to be true, it's simply saying a benevolent Creator is possible in the world with evil and suffering and that in the long run, it's possible all humans (those who fail and those who are successful) will be at peace.
From that perspective, being given the opportunity to earn praise, would seem benevolent, specially down the line, billions years of peace and tranquility will make suffering in this world seem trivial.
The negation of premise would be that earned higher praise facing evil and suffering cannot be out a worthy goal of creating a world that encompasses evil and suffering. But this seems false to me.
