RE: Uprooting believers.
April 5, 2013 at 3:52 pm
(This post was last modified: April 5, 2013 at 3:53 pm by Golbez.)
I really do think the argument is being made for five individual writers, and certainly "Evid3nc3" states as much at 5:40. Of the 6 points put forth, "dialect", "smooth narrative flow", "connections to other books," and "political motives" could speak to either individual authors or a group of authors.
But I think "terminology" and "consistent content" points to individual authors. I think it's unlikely that multiple people are writing each section with such cohesion and consistency, unless they took extra efforts to emulate a style of just one voice. Not to say that those 5 individual people couldn't be drawing off of a group for their inspirations though. Could have been a group project with only one literate person heading it, or something like that for each case.
But I think "terminology" and "consistent content" points to individual authors. I think it's unlikely that multiple people are writing each section with such cohesion and consistency, unless they took extra efforts to emulate a style of just one voice. Not to say that those 5 individual people couldn't be drawing off of a group for their inspirations though. Could have been a group project with only one literate person heading it, or something like that for each case.
Religious but open minded about the arguments of atheists? You may have spent your whole life learning about the arguments for religion. May I present to you 10 segmented hours for the case against it?
